Holder cohorts
Compare address counts and balances across size thresholds to see how distribution changes over time.
Explore →Holder data is useful only when its limits are clear. KAS Watch tracks address cohorts, large-balance changes and labeled exchange balances while avoiding the common mistake of treating every address as a person or every transfer as a buy or sell.
Compare address counts and balances across size thresholds to see how distribution changes over time.
Explore →Review the direction of large-balance cohorts using comparable snapshots rather than isolated transactions.
Explore →Track balances only for addresses carrying an exchange or service label from the Kaspa naming source used by KAS Watch.
Explore →A Kaspa rich list ranks addresses by on-chain balance. That is useful for understanding concentration at the address level, but an address is not automatically a unique person. Exchanges, custodians, services and individual users can operate multiple addresses, while one labeled service address may aggregate balances belonging to many customers.
KAS Watch therefore focuses on distribution and change rather than trying to guess identity. Holder cohorts group addresses by balance range, large-balance views compare comparable snapshots, and exchange labels are shown only when the configured public naming source provides a label.
A balance increase or decrease also does not reveal economic intent by itself. Funds can move for custody, wallet consolidation, operational reasons or exchange flows that are not visible from one transaction alone. Holder analytics are most useful as a map of observable balances and changes, not as proof that a whale bought or sold.
It is a ranking of public Kaspa addresses by on-chain balance. It describes addresses, not verified real-world owners.
Not necessarily. A large address may belong to an exchange, custodian, service, organization or individual, and unlabeled ownership should not be guessed.
KAS Watch displays an exchange or service label only when its configured public naming source supplies that label.
A blockchain address is not the same thing as a unique person. Exchange balances cover only labeled addresses available to the underlying naming source, and a balance increase or decrease does not reveal economic intent by itself.